‘88% of respondents supported option 1, while the government’s preferred option was backed by a mere 3%’ — why the UK’s AI copyright consultation backfired

‘88% of respondents supported option 1, while the government’s preferred option was backed by a mere 3%’ — why the UK’s AI copyright consultation backfired

‘88% of respondents supported option 1, while the government’s preferred option was backed by a mere 3%’ — why the UK’s AI copyright consultation backfired


  • Just 3% of public respondents supported the UK government’s preferred copyright plan for AI training
  • Over 88% want AI developers to get explicit permission before using copyrighted work
  • Creators across the UK are pushing back hard against opt-out schemes they say undermine their rights

When the UK government launched a public consultation on AI and copyright in early 2025, it likely didn’t expect to receive a near-unanimous dressing-down. But of the roughly 10,000 responses submitted through its official “Citizen Space” platform, just 3% supported the government’s preferred policy for regulating how AI uses copyrighted material for training. A massive 88% backed a stricter approach focused on rights-holders.

The survey asked for opinions on four possible routes the UK might take to address what rules should apply when AI developers train their models on books, songs, art, and other copyrighted works. The government’s favored route was labeled Option 3 and offered a compromise where AI developers had a default right to use copyrighted material as long as they disclosed what they used, and offered a way for those with the rights to the material to opt out. But most who responded disagreed.





Source link

Back To Top